INTERACTION OF STATISTICAL AND LEXICAL-SEMANTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF ADJECTIVES IN DIFFERENT SYNTACTIC FUNCTIONS IN THE ENGLISH ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING TEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/folia.philologica/2025/9/7Keywords:
statistical data, lexical layers, lexemes, attributive, predicativeAbstract
The aim of the proposed article is to describe the results of the study concerning the interaction of statistical and lexical-semantic characteristics of adjectives in the attributive and predicative functions, which are found in the English texts referred to scientific and technical discourse. The research was based on the text corpus of the spetialty “Electrical Engineering”. The sources of the text corpus were scientific articles published in the relevant scientific journals of UK and the USA: IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, Proceedings of the Institution of Electrical Engineers. The total volume of the corpus is 200 thousand tokens. The analysis included three stages. The main methods used in the study were the following: literature review, contextual analysis, expert assessment method, i.e. survey of electrical specialists, statistical methods of calculation and others. The first stage involved the creation of a text corpus, compilation of a frequency dictionary of word forms (probabilistic-statistical model), selection of a list of adjectives and determination of their statistical characteristics, as well as their distribution regarding syntactic functions. A significant predominance of attributive adjectives over predicative ones was discovered. The second stage was devoted to stratification of the list of adjectives into three lexical layers, calculation of quantitative indicators of units of each lexical layer. Calculations showed that the most numerous is the commonly used layer, in second place is the general scientific layer, and the terminological layer turned out to be the most insignificant in terms of the number of lexemes. At the third stage, the interaction of statistical, lexical-semantic and grammatical characteristics of adjectives was considered. As a result, significant coincidences were found (with a small degree of exceptions), which could be caused by the undoubted dependence of the three analyzed characteristics on each other during their interaction in texts.
References
Nevreva, M.M., Diachenko, H.F., Shapa, L.M. (2014). Heneza imennykh prefiksalnykh morfem v anhliiskykh tekstakh naukovoho funktsionalnoho styliu [Genesis of nominal prefix morthemes in the English texts of scientific functional style]. Visnyk kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V.N. Karazina Seriia “Romano-hermanska filolohiia. Metodyka vykladannia inozemnykh mov” – Bulleten of Khakiv National University named after V.N. Karazin. “Romance-German Philology. Methodology of teaching foreign languages”, 1103, 155–159 [in Ukrainian].
Perebyinis, V.I. (2002). Statystychni metody dlia linhvistiv [Statistical methods for linguists]. Vinnytsia: Nova knyha [in Ukrainian].
Slipetska, V. (2023). Stratyfikatsiia terminiv u naukovomu teksti: zhanrovi kharakterystyky [Stratification of terms in scientific texts: genre characteristics]. Aktualni pytannia humanitarnykh nauk – Current nutrition of humanities, 69 (3) [in Ukrainian].
Shepitko, S.V. (2004). Mekhanizmy utvorennia ta zakonomirnosti vtorynnoi nominatsii anhliiskoi zahalnonaukovoi diieslivnoi leksyky [Mechanisms of establishment and regularities of the second nomination of English verbal scientific vocabulary]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kharkivskyi nats. un-t im. V.N. Karazina. Kharkiv [in Ukrainian].
Arianto, M.A., Haq, M., Jufrizal, J. (2023). Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics: A Comparative Study on the Use of Appeals. Journal of Language and Education, 9 (2), 12–24.
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S., Egbert, J. (2022). The register-functional approach to grammatical complexity: Theoretical founda-tion, descriptive research findings, application. Routledge.
Breban, T. (2010). English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Mouton De Gruyter, 2010.
Curme, G.O. (1957). English Grammar. New York: Barnes and Noble, Inc.
Guglielmo, Cinque (2009). The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hwang, J.-W. (2025). Binary logistic analyses on responses of being healthy and unhealthy to positive and negative mindsets in caregivers. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9 (5), 92–100.
Nesfield, J.C. (1910). English Grammar Past and Present. London: McMillan and Co.
Parviz, M. (2023). A comparative corpus-based investigation of results sections of research articles in Applied Linguistics and Physics. ICAME Journal, 47 (1), 81–108.
Parviz, M., Lan, G. (2023). A Corpus-based Investigation of Phrasal Complexity Features and Rhetorical Functions in Data Commentary. Journal of Language and Education, 9 (3), 90–109.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Startvik, J. (1972). A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Teyssier, J. (1968). Notes on the syntax of the adjective in Modern English. Lingua 20. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co., 225–249.
Thorndike, E., Lorge, I. (1968) The Teacher’s Word book of 30 000 words. New York: Columbia University Teacher’s college press.
Tsinova, M.V. (2014). Lexical component of the second constituent of modal verb constructions in the texts of scientific-technical communication. Bulleten of Khakiv National University named after V.N. Karazin. “Romance-German Philology. Methodology of teaching foreign languages”, 1125, 48–54.
Wulff, S. (2003). A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8 (2), 245–282.
