THE WAR OF THE NARRATIVES: THE AGRESSOR’S RHETORIC AT THE BEGINNING OF THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR (BASED ON THE RUSSIAN NEWS AGENCIES’ MATERIALS IN 2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/folia.philologica/2025/9/6Keywords:
narrative, historical narrative, narrative discourse, the war of the narratives, conceptual world picture, propagandist discourse, framing, simulacrumAbstract
This research is devoted to the Russian media use of the narrative as a type of weapon in their hybrid war against Ukraine. The article aims to analyze linguistic and stylistic rhetoric specifics of the enemy narratives that followed the beginning of modern Russian-Ukrainian war in 2014, based on the materials published by Russian news agencies TASS and RIA-News. Such linguistic analysis makes it possible to understand how language and stylistic means are used by the narrator in order to deliver a certain ideological message, and how they shape perception and understanding of the world, value system and beliefs in the minds of the recipients. While studying media discourse in the context of the beginning of modern Russian-Ukrainian war, we have been pursuing two main approaches to the narrative analysis: the paradigmatic approach (based on ideas of K. Levi-Strauss), and syntagmatic approach (based on Russian folklorist V. Propp). Revisiting the works of the Russian explorer is not accidental, whereas while analyzing propagandist narratives in Russian media that actively followed events during the annexation of Crimea and partial occupation of Donetsk and Luhansk regions in 2014, we can trace analogies with “Proppian” narrative structure. It has been proven that the rhetoric of the narratives’ war during indicated period considered all possible linguistic and stylistic specifics in order to persuade and affect different audiences. It is mainly focused regarding the past, symbolism, images and myths. The interpretation of events, framing, mythologization, distortion of the historical past, creation of fakes and simulacrums, dehumanization, labeling, the binary contrast “positive-negative” (“friend-or-foe”), negative evaluative semantics and value-meaning assessment have become the main techniques. Analyzing all linguistic and cognitive technologies, techniques and methods that Russian Federation has been exploiting in the context of modern Russian-Ukrainian war via state controlled media not only will help to resist enemy’s aggression, but it will also help to avert the further Russian expansion into other European countries.
References
Keba, O., & Semeliuk, R. (2018). Analityka naratyvnoho dyskursu [Narrative discourse analytics]. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Aksioma [in Ukrainian].
Zrazhevska, N. (2022). Opovidni stratehii suchasnoho mediatekstu [Narrative strategies of modern media text]. Sotsialni komunikatsii: teoriia i praktyka / Social Communications: Theory and Practice, 14 (1), 53–70. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.51423/2524-0471-2022-14-1-10 [in Ukrainian].
Kompantseva, L.F. (2024). “Bytva naratyviv” yak marker hibrydnoi viiny (kontent-analiz informatsiinoho prostoru Kharkivshchyny) [“Battle of narratives” as a marker of hybrid war (content analysis of the information space of the Kharkiv region)]. Zapysky z ukrainskoho movoznavstva – Notes on Ukrainian Linguistics, 31, 329–340 [in Ukrainian].
Kondryko, A. (2014). Naratyvna semiotyka v systemi metodiv doslidzhennia mediatekstu/dyskursu [Narrative semiotics in the system of methods for researching media text/discourse]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zhurnalistyky – Scientific notes of the Institute of Journalism, 54, 268–271 [in Ukrainian].
Kravchenko, N. (2014). Naratyv yak dyskurs: katehorii, funktsii, metody doslidzhennia v rakursi suchasnoho dyskurs-analizu [Narrative as discourse: categories, functions, research methods from the perspective of modern discourse analysis]. Odeskyi linhvistychnyi visnyk – Odessa Linguistic Bulletin, 4, 134–139 [in Ukrainian].
Nikitina, A., Barylova, H., Kravchenko, M. (2021). Rytoryka [Rhetoric]. Starobilsk [in Ukrainian].
Kholokh, O., Topalskyi ,V., Skriabin, O., Maraiev, V. (2024). “Obraz voroha” u viinakh ta voienno-politychnykh konfliktakh (ХХ–ХХІ st.) [“Image of the enemy” in wars and military-political conflicts (XX–XXI centuries)]. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
Ozhevan, M. (2016). Hlobalna viina stratehichnykh naratyviv: vyklyky ta ryzyky dlia Ukrainy [The Global War of Strategic Narratives: Challenges and Risks for Ukraine]. Stratehichni priorytety. Seriia: Polityka – Strategic Priorities. Series: Politics, 4, 30–40 [in Ukrainian].
Oksfordskyi slovnyk nazvav “postpravdu” slovom roku [Oxford Dictionary names ‘post-truth’ word of the year] (2016). BBC. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/society/2016/11/161116_word_of_the_year_sm [in Ukrainian].
Onobl, E. Zitknennia pamiati i konflikt naratyviv [The clash of memory and the conflict of narratives]. Kontur. Retrieved from: https://kontur.media/aunoble/ [in Ukrainian].
Papusha, I. (2013). Modus ponens. Narysy z naratolohii [Modus ponens. Essays on narratology]. Ternopil: Krok [in Ukrainian].
Pocheptsov, H. (2008). Naratyv yak instrumentarii: vid literaturoznavstva do borotby z teroryzmom [Narrative as a toolkit: from literary studies to the fight against terrorism]. Politychnyi menedzhment – Political management, 4, 3–11 [in Ukrainian].
Pocheptsov, H. (2022). Ne chytaite chuzhykh naratyviv [Don’t read other people’s narratives]. Detektor media. Retrieved from: https://detector.media/infospace/article/203940/2022-10-20-ne-chytayte-chuzhykh-naratyviv/ [in Ukrainian].
Renthen naratyviv: velyka vitchyzniana viina [X-ray of narratives: the Great Patriotic War] (2023). Propastop. Retrieved from: https://www.propastop.org/ru/2023/08/21/%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%BD-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B2-%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F-%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2/ [in Russian].
Rymar, N. (2016). Naratyvni stratehii khudozhnoi prozy Niny Bichui [Narrative strategies of Nina Bichua’s fiction]. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi derzhavnyi pedahohichnyi universytet imeni Hryhoriia Skovorody – Pereyaslav-Khmelnytskyi State Pedagogical University named after Hryhoriy Skovoroda [in Ukrainian].
Savchuk, R. (2019). Semiozys avtorskykh naratyvnykh tekhnik i taktyk u frantsuzkomu khudozhnomu tekstotvorenni ХІХ st. [Semiosis of authorial narrative techniques and tactics in French literary texts of the 19th century.]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Filolohiia – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanitarian University. Series: Philology, 38 (2), 126–128 [in Ukrainian].
Skott, L. (2022). Yak avtokraty manipuliuiut istoriieiu, shchoby vtrymatysia u vladi [How autocrats manipulate history to stay in power]. Coda. Retrieved from: https://www.codastory.com/ru/autocrats-history-2/ [in Russian].
Snytko, O., Hrechka, S. (2022). Bytva naratyviv u suchasnomu mediaprostori Ukrainy [The battle of narratives in the modern media space of Ukraine]. Aktualni problemy ukrainskoi linhvistyky: teoriia i praktyka – Current problems of Ukrainian linguistics: theory and practice, 44, 86–117. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.17721/APULTP.2022.44.86-117 [in Ukrainian].
Stepanova, L., Yan, Yu. (2019). Naratyvno-dyskursyvnyi pidkhid v aspekti mystetskoi pedahohiky [Narrativediscursive approach in the aspect of artistic pedagogy]. Naukovyi visnyk Pivdennoukrainskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni K.D. Ushynskoho – Scientific Bulletin of the South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K.D. Ushynsky, 3 (128), 110–116 [in Ukrainian].
Shevchenko, O. (2014). Osoblyvosti propahandystskoho dyskursu RF v period perekhodu do neototalitarnykh politychnykh praktyk [Peculiarities of the Russian Federation’s propaganda discourse during the transition to neototalitarian political practices]. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy – Scientific notes of the I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethno-National Studies of the NAS of Ukraine, 6 (74) [in Ukrainian].
Shelkovnikova, Z. (2013). Naratyvnyi povorot v linhvistytsi [The narrative turn in linguistics]. Linhvistyka ХХІ stolittia – Linguistics of the 21st century. Retrieved from: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/linds_2013_2013_24 [in Ukrainian].
Yavorska, H. (2021). Dynamika naratyviv (do problemy kohnityvnoi opirnosti mediinoho prostoru) [Dynamics of narratives (to the problem of cognitive resistance of media space)]. Stratehichni komunikatsii v umovakh hibrydnoi viiny: pohliad vid volontera do naukovtsia –Strategic Communications in Hybrid Warfare: A View from a Volunteer to a Scientist (pp. 26–37). Kyiv: Natsionalna akademiia SB Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].
Fautré, W. (2022). Conflicting values and conflicting narratives: the case of Russia’s war on Ukraine. Diplomat magazine. Retrieved from: https://diplomatmagazine.eu/2022/08/08/conflicting-values-and-conflicting-narratives-thecase-of-russias-war-on-ukraine/ [in English].
Maan, A. (2015). Narrative Approach to Interethnic Conflicts: Narrative Templates as Cultural Limiters to Narrative Transformations. Conflict and Narrative: Explorations in Theory and Practice. Retrieved from: https://www.ajitkaurmaan.com/uploads/2/6/7/9/26794704/calls_to_terrorism_and_other_weak_narratives.pdf [in English].
Maan, A. Narrative warfare. Real Clear Defence. Retrieved from: https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2018/02/27/narrative_warfare_113118.html [in English].
